A Member of Parliament has formally sought a comprehensive statement from the Departmental Committee on Environment, Forestry and Mining regarding the proposed mineral exploration project in Kwale County, citing growing anxiety among residents over its implications.

Rising on the floor of the National Assembly, Kwale county MP, Hon. Fatuma Masito drew attention to a January 2026 announcement by the Ministry of Mining, Blue Economy and Maritime Affairs on planned exploration of rare earth minerals and niobium in Rima.

“Honourable Speaker, I rise on a matter concerning environment, forestry and mining regarding the proposed mining activities in Kwale County,” she stated, underscoring the need for transparency and public accountability.

While acknowledging the economic potential of the project, the legislator warned that uncertainty surrounding its scope and implementation had unsettled the local community. She pointed to fears of possible displacement, environmental degradation and disruption of livelihoods, as well as a lack of clarity on revenue sharing.

“Residents are keen to understand the modalities for revenue sharing and how the project will benefit the local community,” she added.

In her request, Hon. Masito called for “a detailed report on the current status, scope and timelines of the proposed mining project,” alongside a full account of public participation undertaken by the government and relevant agencies.

She further pressed for disclosure of the Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA), including safeguards for biodiversity, cultural heritage and livelihoods. The MP also demanded clarity on benefit-sharing frameworks, corporate social responsibility obligations, and any resettlement plans, insisting on “fair and timely compensation where necessary.”

Supporting the request, Matuga MP, Hon. Kassim Tandaza pointed out the  historical grievances from previous mining operations in Kwale, warning that unresolved issues continue to erode public trust.

“The Mining Act is very clear that, out of the royalties: 70 per cent remains with the national government, 20 per cent goes to the county government, and 10 per cent goes to the local community,” he said. “Today, 10–12 years later the community is yet to receive the 10 per cent that is clearly provided for in law.”

Hon. Tandaza cautioned that failure to address past injustices risks fuelling further resistance. “Otherwise, the community will always be apprehensive when it comes to issues of mining,” he noted.

The matter was referred to the Departmental Committee on Environment, Forestry and Mining.